NPI-16: Narcissistic Personality Inventory

Introduction

The NPI-16 (Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16) is a widely-used self-report measure designed to assess subclinical narcissistic traits in non-clinical populations. Developed by Ames, Rose, and Anderson (2006) as a shortened version of the original 40-item Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI), this efficient 16-item scale captures the core dimensions of narcissistic personality while significantly reducing administration time. The NPI-16 has become a standard tool in personality and social psychology research, providing a practical alternative to longer narcissism measures without sacrificing psychometric quality.

Understanding Subclinical Narcissism

The NPI-16 measures narcissistic traits that exist on a continuum in the general population, distinct from clinical Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). These traits include grandiose self-perception, entitlement, willingness to exploit others, and diminished empathy. While clinical NPD is a diagnosable personality disorder characterized by pervasive patterns causing significant impairment, subclinical narcissism refers to personality characteristics that can be found at varying levels across normal populations. Understanding these characteristics is crucial for research in social psychology, organizational behavior, interpersonal relationships, and personality development.

Theoretical Foundation

The NPI-16 is grounded in social-personality theories of narcissism that conceptualize it as a multifaceted construct involving both adaptive and maladaptive components. Based on Raskin and Terry’s (1988) original NPI, which drew from clinical descriptions of narcissistic personality, the measure reflects several theoretical traditions. These include psychodynamic perspectives emphasizing grandiose self-views as compensation for underlying insecurity, social-cognitive approaches focusing on inflated self-perceptions and self-enhancement motives, and interpersonal models highlighting dominance-seeking and lack of communal orientation. The forced-choice format was designed to reduce social desirability bias while capturing the essence of narcissistic self-perception—the tendency to view oneself as superior, special, and entitled to recognition.

Core Dimensions of Narcissistic Traits

Research with the NPI has identified several core components that characterize narcissistic personality:

Grandiosity and superiority encompass inflated self-regard, beliefs about being special or unique, and expectations of admiration and recognition from others. This dimension reflects the narcissist’s conviction of personal exceptionalism.

Entitlement and exploitation involve expectations of special treatment, willingness to take advantage of others for personal gain, and lack of reciprocity in relationships. These traits reflect the instrumental use of others to maintain self-worth.

Authority and leadership capture the desire to be in control and influential, comfort with power and dominance, and assumptions about natural leadership abilities. This dimension represents the agentic aspects of narcissism.

Self-sufficiency involves independence and self-reliance, resistance to depending on others, and high confidence in personal abilities. This reflects the narcissistic emphasis on autonomy and self-admiration.

🎯 Research Focus: The NPI-16 is designed for research purposes and measures normal-range narcissistic traits, not clinical pathology. High scores indicate greater narcissistic characteristics but do not diagnose personality disorders.

Key Features

Assessment Characteristics

  • 16 forced-choice items comparing narcissistic vs. non-narcissistic response pairs
  • 3-5 minutes administration time
  • Ages 18+ through adult with primary validation in college and adult samples
  • Public domain for research use
  • Dichotomous scoring (0 or 1 per item)

Narcissistic Trait Dimensions Assessed

  • Grandiosity – Inflated self-importance and belief in exceptionalism
  • Superiority – View of self as better than others
  • Entitlement – Expectation of special treatment and privileges
  • Exploitativeness – Willingness to use others instrumentally
  • Authority – Desire for power and leadership
  • Self-sufficiency – Emphasis on independence and self-reliance
  • Vanity – Preoccupation with appearance and admiration

Research and Applied Applications

Clinical research studying subclinical narcissism in non-patient populations

Social psychology research on personality and interpersonal behavior

Organizational studies examining leadership styles and workplace dynamics

Relationship research investigating romantic and social interaction patterns

Developmental psychology tracking narcissistic trait changes across lifespan

Cross-cultural research comparing narcissism across societies and cultures

View Testable Demo

► Click here to try the Testable implementation

Assess subclinical narcissistic personality traits using the forced-choice format.

Scoring and Interpretation

Response Format

The NPI-16 uses a forced-choice format where participants select between two statements for each item—one reflecting narcissistic traits and one reflecting non-narcissistic traits. Participants choose the statement that better describes them.

Sample Items

For each pair, participants choose the statement that best applies:

Item Example 1:

  • A) “I am more capable than other people” (narcissistic response)
  • B) “There is a lot that I can learn from other people” (non-narcissistic response)

Item Example 2:

  • A) “I try not to be a show off” (non-narcissistic response)
  • B) “I am apt to show off if I get the chance” (narcissistic response)

Item Example 3:

  • A) “I am going to be a great person” (narcissistic response)
  • B) “I hope I am going to be successful” (non-narcissistic response)

Scoring Procedure

  • Score 1 point for each narcissistic response selected
  • Score 0 points for each non-narcissistic response selected
  • Sum all items for total score
  • Score range: 0-16 points
  • Higher scores indicate greater narcissistic traits

Score Interpretation Guidelines

General interpretation ranges:

  • 0-5: Low narcissistic traits (below average)
  • 6-10: Moderate narcissistic traits (average range)
  • 11-16: High narcissistic traits (above average)

Population Norms

  • College students: M = 7.7, SD = 4.6 (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Community adults: M = 6.2, SD = 4.1 (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Gender differences: Males typically score 1-2 points higher than females (Ames et al., 2006)

Contextual Considerations

  • Research vs. clinical: These scores represent personality variation, not pathology
  • Age effects: Narcissistic traits tend to decline from emerging adulthood through midlife
  • Gender patterns: Males consistently score higher across cultures and age groups
  • Cultural context: Scores tend to be higher in individualistic vs. collectivistic cultures

Research Evidence and Psychometric Properties

Reliability Evidence

  • Internal consistency: α = 0.72-0.84 across diverse samples and studies (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Test-retest reliability: r = 0.85 over 8-week interval, demonstrating good temporal stability (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Parallel form reliability: r = 0.90 correlation with full 40-item NPI (Ames et al., 2006)

Factor Structure and Validity

Factor analysis results:

  • Unidimensional structure: Single factor solution supported across multiple samples (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Confirmatory factor analysis: Adequate fit indices for single-factor model across cultures (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Factor loadings: Items show moderate to strong loadings on general narcissism factor (Ames et al., 2006)

Convergent validity:

  • NPI-40 correlation: r = 0.90, indicating excellent correspondence with full version (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Self-esteem: r = 0.35, showing moderate positive relationship (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Extraversion: r = 0.42, consistent with agentic nature of narcissism (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Assertiveness: r = 0.48, reflecting dominance components (Ames et al., 2006)

Discriminant validity:

  • Empathy: r = -0.35, demonstrating expected negative relationship (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Agreeableness: r = -0.45, showing antagonistic aspects of narcissism (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Relationship satisfaction: r = -0.28, consistent with interpersonal difficulties (Ames et al., 2006)

Cross-Cultural Research

  • International validation: Psychometric properties confirmed across multiple countries in North America, Europe, and Asia (various studies)
  • Measurement invariance: Consistent factor structure demonstrated across cultural groups (various studies)
  • Cultural differences: Higher mean scores typically found in individualistic compared to collectivistic cultures (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Translation quality: Validated translations available in multiple languages including Spanish, German, Chinese, and others

Longitudinal and Developmental Research

  • Trait stability: Moderate stability coefficients (r = 0.65) over 2-4 year periods (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Age trends: General decline in narcissistic traits from emerging adulthood through middle age (various studies)
  • Life outcomes: Higher scores predict career ambition and leadership emergence but also relationship difficulties (Campbell & Foster, 2007)

Clinical and Applied Research

  • Workplace behavior: Links to self-promotion, competitiveness, and reduced cooperation (Campbell & Foster, 2007)
  • Leadership emergence: Positive associations with leadership aspirations and initial impression management (Ames et al., 2006)
  • Interpersonal relationships: Negative correlations with relationship quality and empathic concern (Ames et al., 2006)

Clinical Applications and Usage Guidelines

Primary Research Applications

  • Personality research examining individual differences in narcissistic traits
  • Social psychology studies investigating self-enhancement and interpersonal behavior
  • Organizational research exploring leadership, workplace dynamics, and team functioning
  • Relationship studies examining romantic relationships and social interaction patterns
  • Cross-cultural research comparing personality expression across cultural contexts

Research Design Considerations

  • Sample size: Larger samples (N > 200) recommended for stable parameter estimates
  • Social desirability: Consider including measures to control for response bias
  • Gender composition: Account for gender differences in analyses and interpretation
  • Cultural context: Important consideration for cross-cultural or diverse samples
  • Purpose clarity: Participants should understand this assesses personality traits, not pathology

Appropriate Uses

  • Basic research on personality structure and correlates
  • Applied research in organizational and educational settings
  • Screening measure in studies examining narcissism-related outcomes
  • Comparison tool for examining changes over time or across conditions
  • Supplementary assessment alongside other personality measures

Limitations and Cautions

  • Not diagnostic: Does not assess or diagnose Narcissistic Personality Disorder
  • Single dimension: Captures general narcissism but not grandiose vs. vulnerable subtypes
  • Forced-choice limitations: May not capture nuanced individual differences
  • Social desirability: Some underreporting expected despite forced-choice format
  • Clinical populations: Validated primarily in non-clinical samples

Ethical Considerations

  • Research purpose: Clarify that assessment is for research, not clinical evaluation
  • Informed consent: Participants should understand the measure assesses personality characteristics
  • Confidentiality: Particularly important given potential stigma associated with narcissism
  • Feedback provision: Should emphasize trait continuum and research context, not pathology
  • Avoid labeling: Scores represent dimensional traits, not categorical diagnoses

Import & Customize Testable Template

► Import scale to your Testable account – Add this scale. Modify instructions, edit questions, adjust presentation. Test anyone (including yourself)

► Try Testable version – View the full implementation of this scale in Testable.

► View detailed implementation guide in Testable – Step by step instructions for complete customization.

► Browse other tests and scales in Testable Library – The largest collection of ready-made psychological tests and scales.

Copyright and Usage Responsibility: Check that you have the proper rights and permissions to use this assessment tool in your research. This may include purchasing appropriate licenses, obtaining permissions from authors/copyright holders, or ensuring your usage falls within fair use guidelines.

The NPI-16 is in the public domain for research purposes. Researchers are encouraged to cite the original development article when using the measure. Commercial use or clinical applications should acknowledge the original authors and consider consulting them regarding appropriate usage.

Proper Attribution: When using or referencing this scale, cite the original development:

Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 440-450.

Narcissistic Personality Inventory – Wikipedia

Narcissism Research – Psychology Today

Personality and Social Psychology Resources

References

Primary Development Citation:

  • Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 440-450.

Original NPI Development:

  • Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890-902.

Theoretical and Review Papers:

  • Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. Spencer (Eds.), The self (pp. 115-138). Psychology Press.
  • Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). Controversies in narcissism. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 291-315.

Research Applications:

  • Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013-1042.
Last Updated: