LSRP: Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (26-item)

Reviewed by: Constantin Rezlescu | Associate Professor | UCL Psychology

TL;DR

  • The LSRP is a 26-item self-report measure assessing psychopathic traits in non-criminal populations, distinguishing between primary psychopathy (callousness, manipulation) and secondary psychopathy (impulsivity, antisocial behavior) with a 10-15 minute administration time.
  • The scale demonstrates good reliability (Primary α=0.82-0.85, Secondary α=0.63-0.68) and validity, with convergent correlations to PCL-R (r=0.35-0.50) and Machiavellianism, plus distinct behavioral correlates for each factor including reduced empathy and impulsive decision-making.
  • Designed exclusively for research purposes in adults 18+, the LSRP should not be used for clinical diagnosis, forensic decisions, or employment screening; scores are interpreted against college norms (Primary M=33.6, Secondary M=22.1) to assess subclinical psychopathic characteristics.

Introduction

The Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRP) is a 26-item measure designed to assess psychopathic traits in non-institutionalized populations. Developed by Levenson, Kiehl, and Fitzpatrick (1995), the LSRP provides a self-report method for measuring psychopathic characteristics in community and college samples where traditional psychopathy assessments designed for forensic settings may not be appropriate.

Psychopathy in Non-Criminal Populations

While psychopathy is often studied in criminal and forensic contexts, psychopathic traits exist on a continuum and can be observed at subclinical levels in the general population. Individuals with elevated psychopathic traits who have not engaged in serious criminal behavior may still exhibit interpersonal, affective, and behavioral characteristics associated with the construct (Paulhus & Williams, 2002).

Two-Factor Structure

The LSRP distinguishes between primary psychopathy (characterized by callousness, manipulativeness, and lack of empathy) and secondary psychopathy (characterized by impulsivity, antisocial behavior, and social deviance). This two-factor structure parallels distinctions made in clinical psychopathy research while being suitable for non-forensic assessment (Levenson et al., 1995).

Research and Ethical Context

The LSRP enables research on psychopathic traits in settings where clinical interviews or forensic instruments would be impractical. Studies using the LSRP have contributed to understanding the personality correlates, behavioral outcomes, and neurobiological bases of psychopathic characteristics (Brinkley et al., 2008).

⚖️ Subclinical Measurement: The LSRP assesses psychopathic personality traits in non-criminal populations, facilitating research on the full continuum of these characteristics.

Key Features

Assessment Characteristics

  • 26 items measuring primary and secondary psychopathy factors
  • 10-15 minutes administration time
  • Ages 18+ through adult populations
  • 4-point Likert scale for response options
  • Two-factor structure distinguishing psychopathy subtypes

Psychopathy Dimensions

  • Primary psychopathy: Callousness, manipulativeness, egocentricity, lack of empathy
  • Secondary psychopathy: Impulsivity, irresponsibility, antisocial behavior, social deviance
  • Distinct patterns of correlates for each factor
  • Suitable for non-institutionalized populations
  • Focus on personality traits rather than criminal behavior

Research Applications

  • Personality psychology research on subclinical psychopathy
  • Organizational research on workplace manipulation
  • Relationship research on interpersonal exploitation
  • Neuroscience studies of empathy and moral processing
  • Behavioral genetics research on psychopathic traits

View Testable Demo

► Click here to try the Testable implementation

Assess personality characteristics associated with psychopathic traits in non-clinical populations.

Scoring and Interpretation

Response Format

Participants rate their agreement with each statement using a 4-point Likert scale:

  • 1 = Disagree strongly
  • 2 = Disagree somewhat
  • 3 = Agree somewhat
  • 4 = Agree strongly

Sample Items by Factor

Primary Psychopathy (16 items):

  • “Success is based on survival of the fittest; I am not concerned about the losers”
  • “For me, what’s right is whatever I can get away with”
  • “In today’s world, I feel justified in doing anything I can get away with to succeed”
  • “I quickly lose interest in tasks I start”

Secondary Psychopathy (10 items):

  • “I have been in a lot of shouting matches with other people”
  • “I find myself in the same kinds of trouble, time after time”
  • “I am often bored”
  • “Before I do anything, I carefully consider the possible consequences”

Scoring Procedure

  1. Reverse score designated items (subtract from 5)
  2. Sum items for Primary Psychopathy subscale (16 items, range: 16-64)
  3. Sum items for Secondary Psychopathy subscale (10 items, range: 10-40)
  4. Calculate total score by summing both subscales (range: 26-104)

Score Interpretation Guidelines

Primary Psychopathy:

  • High (48-64): Elevated callous, manipulative traits
  • Moderate (32-47): Average levels
  • Low (16-31): Below average on these characteristics

Secondary Psychopathy:

  • High (30-40): Elevated impulsive, antisocial tendencies
  • Moderate (20-29): Average levels
  • Low (10-19): Below average on these characteristics

Population Norms:

  • College students – Primary: M = 33.6, SD = 8.1; Secondary: M = 22.1, SD = 5.4 (Levenson et al., 1995)
  • Community adults – Primary: M = 31.2, SD = 7.8; Secondary: M = 20.8, SD = 5.2 (Brinkley et al., 2008)

Research Evidence and Psychometric Properties

Reliability Evidence

  • Internal consistency: Primary α = 0.82-0.85; Secondary α = 0.63-0.68 (Levenson et al., 1995)
  • Test-retest reliability: r = 0.83 for Primary, r = 0.68 for Secondary (Brinkley et al., 2008)
  • Two-factor structure shows adequate internal consistency

Validity Evidence

Factor structure:

  • Two-factor model consistently replicated (Levenson et al., 1995)
  • Primary and secondary factors show moderate correlation (r = 0.40-0.50)
  • Factors demonstrate differential correlates (Brinkley et al., 2008)

Convergent validity:

  • Psychopathy Checklist: r = 0.35-0.50 for total score (Brinkley et al., 2008)
  • Machiavellianism: r = 0.45-0.60 for Primary (Paulhus & Williams, 2002)
  • Impulsivity: r = 0.40-0.55 for Secondary (Levenson et al., 1995)

Discriminant patterns:

  • Primary associated with low anxiety, low empathy (Levenson et al., 1995)
  • Secondary associated with higher anxiety, negative emotionality (Brinkley et al., 2008)
  • Factors show distinct Big Five correlates (Paulhus & Williams, 2002)

Behavioral Correlates

Primary psychopathy associations:

  • Reduced empathic responses (Levenson et al., 1995)
  • Manipulative interpersonal tactics (Paulhus & Williams, 2002)
  • Lower anxiety and fear responses (Brinkley et al., 2008)

Secondary psychopathy associations:

  • Impulsive decision-making (Levenson et al., 1995)
  • Substance use behaviors (Brinkley et al., 2008)
  • Higher negative emotionality (Paulhus & Williams, 2002)

Usage Guidelines and Applications

Primary Research Applications

  • Personality research in non-forensic populations
  • Studies of empathy and moral decision-making
  • Organizational research on workplace behavior
  • Relationship research on interpersonal exploitation
  • Behavioral genetics studies of antisocial traits

Research Considerations

The LSRP is designed for research purposes in non-institutionalized populations. It assesses personality traits associated with psychopathy rather than providing clinical diagnosis. Elevated scores indicate presence of psychopathic characteristics but do not indicate psychopathology requiring clinical intervention in the absence of other indicators (Levenson et al., 1995).

Ethical Considerations

Research using psychopathy measures requires careful attention to ethical issues including informed consent, confidentiality, and appropriate use of results. The LSRP should not be used for employment screening, forensic decision-making, or other high-stakes applications without additional comprehensive assessment (Paulhus & Williams, 2002).

Limitations

  • Self-report format may be influenced by social desirability
  • Lower reliability for Secondary subscale
  • Not suitable for forensic or clinical diagnosis
  • Designed for research rather than applied decision-making
  • Cultural factors may influence item interpretation

Import & Customize Testable Template

► Import scale to your Testable account – Add this scale. Modify instructions, edit questions, adjust presentation. Test anyone (including yourself)

► Try Testable version – View the full implementation of this scale in Testable.

► View detailed implementation guide in Testable – Step by step instructions for complete customization.

► Browse other tests and scales in Testable Library – The largest collection of ready-made psychological tests and scales.

Copyright and Usage Responsibility: Check that you have the proper rights and permissions to use this assessment tool in your research. This may include purchasing appropriate licenses, obtaining permissions from authors/copyright holders, or ensuring your usage falls within fair use guidelines.

Proper Attribution: When using or referencing this scale, cite the original development:

  • Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 151-158.

References

Primary Development:

  • Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 151-158.

Validation Studies:

  • Brinkley, C. A., et al. (2008). The construct validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(3), 269-278.
  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563.
Illustration of a menacing shark with sharp-toothed grin wearing a red tie swimming through dark blue-green waters with blood clouds and shadowy fish in the background, with the Testable logo and text "LSRP Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale"
A predatory shark in business attire — embodying callousness, manipulation, and lack of empathy measured by the LSRP (Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale)

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the LSRP measure?

The LSRP measures psychopathic personality traits in non-criminal populations across two dimensions: primary psychopathy (callousness, manipulativeness, lack of empathy) and secondary psychopathy (impulsivity, irresponsibility, antisocial behavior). It assesses subclinical psychopathy on a continuum rather than diagnosing clinical psychopathy.

How long does the LSRP take to complete?

The LSRP takes approximately 10-15 minutes to complete. It consists of 26 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale, making it a relatively quick self-report assessment suitable for research settings with non-institutionalized adult populations.

Is the LSRP free to use?

The LSRP is available for research purposes. Researchers should cite the original development article (Levenson, Kiehl, & Fitzpatrick, 1995) when using the scale. For specific licensing or commercial use questions, consult the original authors or your institution's research guidelines.

How is the LSRP scored?

Items are rated 1-4 (Disagree strongly to Agree strongly). Reverse-score designated items by subtracting from 5. Sum 16 items for Primary Psychopathy (range 16-64) and 10 items for Secondary Psychopathy (range 10-40). Total score ranges from 26-104. Higher scores indicate greater psychopathic traits.

What's the difference between LSRP and PCL-R?

The LSRP is a self-report questionnaire for non-criminal populations taking 10-15 minutes, while the PCL-R (Psychopathy Checklist-Revised) is a clinician-administered interview for forensic settings requiring extensive training and file review. The LSRP correlates moderately with PCL-R (r=0.35-0.50) but is designed for research, not clinical diagnosis.

How reliable is the LSRP?

The LSRP shows good reliability for the Primary subscale (α=0.82-0.85, test-retest r=0.83) and adequate reliability for the Secondary subscale (α=0.63-0.68, test-retest r=0.68). The two-factor structure is consistently replicated across studies, demonstrating stable psychometric properties for research applications in non-forensic populations.
Last Updated: