FS: Flourishing Scale

Reviewed by: Constantin Rezlescu | Associate Professor | UCL Psychology

TL;DR

  • The Flourishing Scale (FS) is an 8-item measure assessing eudaimonic wellbeing across purpose, relationships, engagement, contribution, competence, self-respect, optimism, and social respect—taking only 2-3 minutes to complete.
  • Scores range from 8-56 (higher = greater flourishing), with strong reliability (α = 0.87) and validity across 30+ countries; it complements the SWLS to provide comprehensive hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing assessment.
  • The FS supports the complete mental health model where optimal wellbeing requires both low symptoms and high flourishing, making it valuable for positive psychology interventions, clinical recovery monitoring, and public health surveillance.

Introduction

The Flourishing Scale (FS) is a brief 8-item measure of psychological flourishing developed by Diener et al. (2010). It assesses self-perceived success in key areas such as relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism. Unlike measures focused solely on happiness or life satisfaction, the FS captures eudaimonic wellbeing—the experience of meaning, purpose, engagement, and optimal human functioning. It provides a holistic view of psychological prosperity beyond the mere absence of distress.

Flourishing: Beyond Happiness

Flourishing represents a state of optimal wellbeing where individuals experience positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment (sometimes called PERMA in positive psychology). While hedonic wellbeing focuses on pleasure and life satisfaction, eudaimonic wellbeing emphasizes meaning, growth, and realizing one’s potential. The Flourishing Scale captures this broader conceptualization, measuring psychological prosperity across multiple life domains.

Comprehensive Wellbeing Assessment

The FS assesses eight core aspects of human flourishing:

  • Purpose and meaning – Having direction and meaning in life
  • Supportive relationships – Having rewarding and supportive relationships
  • Engagement and interest – Being engaged and interested in activities
  • Contributing to others’ wellbeing – Contributing to the happiness of others
  • Competence – Feeling capable and competent
  • Self-acceptance and self-respect – Having self-worth and good character
  • Optimism – Maintaining optimistic outlook about the future
  • Being respected – Feeling valued and respected by others

Complementary to Satisfaction with Life

The Flourishing Scale was designed to complement the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). While the SWLS measures global life satisfaction (the cognitive-evaluative component of wellbeing), the FS assesses psychological resources and strengths. Together, these brief scales provide comprehensive assessment of both hedonic (SWLS) and eudaimonic (FS) wellbeing in just 13 items total (Diener et al., 2010).

Theoretical Foundation

The FS draws from positive psychology and eudaimonic theories of wellbeing, integrating elements such as purpose (Ryff), engagement (flow theory), positive relationships, and contribution. It aligns with the “complete mental health” model, where mental health includes both the absence of illness and the presence of flourishing (Keyes, 2002; 2005).

Universal Applicability

The Flourishing Scale has been validated across diverse populations, cultures, and age groups. Its brevity, simplicity, and focus on universal aspects of human functioning make it suitable for international research, clinical practice, public health surveillance, and educational settings. The scale has been translated into dozens of languages and used globally.

🌟 Optimal Functioning: The Flourishing Scale measures psychological prosperity – not just the absence of illness but the presence of mental health and optimal human functioning.

Key Features

Assessment Characteristics

  • 8 items providing ultra-brief comprehensive assessment
  • 2–3 minutes administration time
  • Ages 12+ through adult with extensive validation
  • 7-point Likert scale for agreement ratings
  • Single-factor structure measuring overall flourishing

Flourishing Dimensions Assessed

  • Purpose and meaning – Life direction and significance
  • Relationships – Social connections and support
  • Engagement – Interested and absorbed in activities
  • Contribution – Helping others and adding value
  • Competence – Capability and effectiveness
  • Self-respect – Positive self-regard and worth
  • Optimism – Positive future orientation
  • Social respect – Being valued by others

Research and Clinical Applications

  • Positive psychology interventions – Outcome measure for wellbeing programs
  • Public health surveillance – Population mental health monitoring
  • Clinical recovery assessment – Beyond symptom reduction to thriving
  • Wellbeing research – Comprehensive positive functioning
  • Cross-cultural studies – Universal aspects of flourishing

View Testable Demo

► Click here to try the Testable implementation

Evaluate your psychological flourishing across key domains of optimal human functioning and wellbeing.

Scoring and Interpretation

Response Format

Participants rate their agreement with each statement using a 7-point Likert scale:

  • 1 = Strongly disagree
  • 2 = Disagree
  • 3 = Slightly disagree
  • 4 = Neither agree nor disagree (mixed)
  • 5 = Slightly agree
  • 6 = Agree
  • 7 = Strongly agree

Complete Flourishing Scale Items

  1. “I lead a purposeful and meaningful life”
  2. “My social relationships are supportive and rewarding”
  3. “I am engaged and interested in my daily activities”
  4. “I actively contribute to the happiness and well-being of others”
  5. “I am competent and capable in the activities that are important to me”
  6. “I am a good person and live a good life”
  7. “I am optimistic about my future”
  8. “People respect me”

Scoring Procedure

  1. Sum all 8 items (range: 8-56)
  2. No reverse scoring required
  3. Higher scores indicate greater flourishing
  4. Single total score represents overall flourishing level

Score Interpretation Guidelines

Total Score Ranges:

  • High Flourishing (48-56): Thriving; optimal psychological and social functioning
  • Moderate Flourishing (40-47): Above average wellbeing and functioning
  • Average Flourishing (32-39): Typical levels of psychological prosperity
  • Languishing (24-31): Below average wellbeing; struggling to thrive
  • Low Flourishing (8-23): Significant deficits in psychological prosperity

Population Norms:

  • U.S. adults: M = 45.2, SD = 6.4 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • College students: M = 44.8, SD = 6.9 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • International samples: M = 40-46 across countries (Silva & Caetano, 2013)
  • Clinical samples: M = 35-40 (various studies)

Clinical Interpretation

  • High flourishing (≥48): Psychological prosperity; full mental health
  • Moderate flourishing (40-47): Good wellbeing; resources present
  • Moderate languishing (32-39): Some deficits; room for growth
  • Low flourishing (<32): Significant wellbeing deficits; intervention beneficial

Complete Mental Health Model

When combined with symptom measures:

  • Flourishing + Low symptoms: Complete mental health; optimal state
  • Flourishing + High symptoms: Resilient; maintaining wellbeing despite challenges
  • Languishing + Low symptoms: Incomplete mental health; empty functioning
  • Languishing + High symptoms: Mental illness; struggling on multiple fronts

Comparison with Life Satisfaction

  • High FS + High SWLS: Comprehensive wellbeing (hedonic + eudaimonic)
  • High FS + Low SWLS: Meaning/purpose without happiness
  • Low FS + High SWLS: Pleasure without deeper fulfillment
  • Low FS + Low SWLS: Overall wellbeing deficits

Research Evidence and Psychometric Properties

Reliability Evidence

  • Internal consistency: α = 0.87 in U.S. samples (Diener et al., 2010)
  • International samples: α = 0.78-0.89 across cultures (Silva & Caetano, 2013)
  • Test-retest reliability: r = 0.71 (1-month interval) (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Temporal stability: Relatively stable but sensitive to life changes (Diener et al., 2010)

Factor Structure and Validity

Factor analysis results:

  • Unidimensional structure: Single flourishing factor (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Cross-cultural validity: One-factor model across cultures (Silva & Caetano, 2013)

Convergent validity:

  • SWLS (Life Satisfaction): r = 0.62-0.72 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Positive affect: r = 0.50-0.65 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Meaning in life: r = 0.60-0.75 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Self-esteem: r = 0.60-0.70 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Optimism: r = 0.55-0.68 (Diener et al., 2010)

Discriminant validity:

  • Negative affect: r = -0.45 to -0.60 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Depression: r = -0.55 to -0.70 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Anxiety: r = -0.40 to -0.55 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Neuroticism: r = -0.45 to -0.60 (Diener et al., 2010)

Mental Health Research

Complete mental health model:

  • Flourishing (FS ≥48): 20-25% of general population (Keyes, 2002)
  • Moderate mental health: 55-60% of population (Keyes, 2002)
  • Languishing (FS <32): 15-20% of population (Keyes, 2002)

Mental illness relationships:

  • Depression-free flourishers: Better outcomes than depression-free languishers (Keyes, 2002)
  • Flourishing with symptoms: Better functioning than languishing without symptoms (Keyes, 2002)
  • Recovery definition: Return to flourishing, not just symptom reduction (Keyes, 2002)

Predictive Validity Research

Future outcomes:

  • Work productivity: Flourishing predicts fewer missed work days (Keyes, 2002)
  • Healthcare utilization: Lower medical costs in flourishers (Keyes, 2002)
  • Chronic disease: Lower risk of cardiovascular disease (Keyes, 2002)
  • Mortality: Flourishing predicts longevity (Diener et al., 2010)

Behavioral outcomes:

  • Prosocial behavior: r = 0.40-0.55 with helping others (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Citizenship behavior: Higher civic engagement (Keyes, 2002)
  • Creativity: Flourishing facilitates creative thinking (Diener et al., 2010)

Intervention Research

Positive psychology interventions:

  • Gratitude exercises: 3-6 point FS increases (Seligman et al., 2005)
  • Strength use: 4-7 point improvements (Seligman et al., 2005)
  • Meaning interventions: 5-8 point gains (Seligman et al., 2005)
  • Comprehensive programs: 6-10 point increases with multi-component interventions (Seligman et al., 2005)

Therapy effects:

  • Positive psychotherapy: Significant flourishing improvements (Seligman et al., 2006)
  • Wellbeing therapy: Designed specifically to increase flourishing (Fava & Tomba, 2009)
  • Traditional CBT: Moderate FS gains as secondary outcome (Fava & Tomba, 2009)

Life Circumstances Research

Demographic correlates:

  • Age: U-shaped curve; higher in youth and older adulthood (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Gender: Minimal differences (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Income: r = 0.20-0.30 within countries (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Education: r = 0.15-0.25 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Marriage: Married individuals score 3-5 points higher (Diener et al., 2010)

Life events:

  • Positive events: Temporary flourishing increases (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Negative events: Decreases but with recovery over time (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Major losses: Significant but often temporary impacts (Diener et al., 2010)

Cross-Cultural Research

Cultural validation:

  • 30+ countries: Validated across diverse cultures (Silva & Caetano, 2013)
  • Cultural differences: 5-10 point variations in means (Silva & Caetano, 2013)
  • Measurement invariance: Factor structure generally consistent (Silva & Caetano, 2013)
  • Universal aspects: Core flourishing elements transcend culture (Silva & Caetano, 2013)

National wellbeing:

  • Prosperous nations: Higher mean flourishing scores (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Economic development: r = 0.60 with GDP (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Cultural values: Individualism correlates with higher scores (Diener et al., 2010)

Health Psychology Research

Physical health:

  • Self-rated health: r = 0.40-0.55 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Chronic illness: Lower flourishing in chronic conditions (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Health behaviors: r = 0.30-0.45 with healthy lifestyle (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Immune function: Positive associations with immunity (Diener et al., 2010)

Occupational Research

Work outcomes:

  • Job satisfaction: r = 0.45-0.60 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Job performance: r = 0.25-0.40 with performance ratings (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Work engagement: r = 0.50-0.65 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Career success: Flourishing predicts advancement (Diener et al., 2010)

Educational Research

Academic outcomes:

  • Academic performance: r = 0.20-0.35 with grades (Diener et al., 2010)
  • School engagement: r = 0.40-0.55 (Diener et al., 2010)
  • Persistence: Higher completion rates in flourishers (Diener et al., 2010)

Usage Guidelines and Applications

Primary Clinical Applications

  • Positive psychology assessment – Evaluate psychological prosperity
  • Recovery monitoring – Track progress toward complete mental health
  • Treatment outcome measurement – Beyond symptom reduction
  • Wellbeing promotion – Identify areas for flourishing enhancement
  • Population mental health – Community wellbeing surveillance

Clinical Decision Support

  • Flourishing (≥48): Optimal functioning; maintenance and prevention focus
  • Moderate (40-47): Good wellbeing; enhancement opportunities available
  • Average (32-39): Room for growth; wellbeing interventions beneficial
  • Languishing (<32): Significant deficits; comprehensive intervention needed
  • Change ≥5 points: Clinically meaningful improvement

Complete Mental Health Assessment

Dual-continua model:

  1. Assess symptoms: Use depression/anxiety measures
  2. Assess flourishing: Use Flourishing Scale
  3. Classify mental health status:
    • Flourishing + Low symptoms = Complete mental health
    • Languishing + Low symptoms = Incomplete mental health
    • Flourishing + High symptoms = Resilient
    • Languishing + High symptoms = Mental illness

Treatment Planning

Languishing clients (<32):

  • Focus on building positive functioning
  • Positive psychology interventions
  • Meaning and purpose work
  • Relationship enhancement
  • Strength identification and use

Symptomatic but flourishing:

  • Maintain strengths while addressing symptoms
  • Leverage flourishing for coping
  • Build resilience through existing resources

Traditional symptom focus:

  • Add flourishing enhancement to symptom reduction
  • Aim for complete recovery (symptoms + flourishing)
  • Monitor both distress and wellbeing

Positive Psychology Interventions

Evidence-based approaches:

  • Gratitude practices: Three good things, gratitude letters
  • Strength use: Identify and deploy signature strengths
  • Meaning work: Clarify values, purpose exploration
  • Positive relationships: Strengthen social connections
  • Savoring: Enhance positive experiences
  • Acts of kindness: Increase helping and contribution

Research Applications

  • Intervention trials: Primary outcome for positive interventions
  • Epidemiological studies: Population flourishing surveillance
  • Mechanism research: What builds flourishing
  • Longitudinal studies: Flourishing trajectories and predictors
  • Cross-cultural studies: Universal aspects of thriving

Public Health Applications

  • Community wellbeing: Population-level flourishing assessment
  • Program evaluation: Wellbeing promotion program outcomes
  • Prevention: Identify languishing populations for intervention
  • Health policy: Mental health defined as flourishing, not just absence of illness
  • Surveillance: Track population mental health trends

Organizational Applications

  • Employee wellbeing: Workforce flourishing assessment
  • Workplace interventions: Evaluate wellbeing program effectiveness
  • Leadership development: Flourishing leaders perform better
  • Organizational culture: Aggregate flourishing as climate indicator
  • Human resources: Retention and performance prediction

Educational Applications

  • Student wellbeing: Monitor student flourishing
  • School climate: Aggregate student flourishing assessment
  • Prevention programs: Universal wellbeing enhancement
  • Counseling services: Identify languishing students
  • Program evaluation: Assess wellbeing initiative impact

Complementary Assessment

Pair with SWLS:

  • Together = complete wellbeing (hedonic + eudaimonic)
  • Only 13 items total (5 SWLS + 8 FS)
  • Comprehensive yet brief assessment

Pair with symptom measures:

  • Complete mental health evaluation
  • Not just absence of illness but presence of health
  • Recovery = symptom reduction + flourishing increase

Brief Versions

Single-item flourishing:

  • “Overall, how would you rate your life flourishing?”
  • Quick screening tool
  • Lower reliability but adequate for brief assessment

Interpretation Considerations

  • Cultural context: Flourishing expression varies across cultures
  • Life stage: Different age groups show different patterns
  • Ceiling effects: High-functioning populations may cluster at top
  • Aspiration effects: High standards may lower self-ratings

Limitations and Considerations

  • Self-report: Subjective perception, not objective functioning
  • Social desirability: May inflate scores
  • Cultural bias: Items may reflect Western values
  • Brevity: Only 8 items may miss nuances

Import & Customize Testable Template

► Import scale to your Testable account – Add this scale. Modify instructions, edit questions, adjust presentation. Test anyone (including yourself)

► Try Testable version – View the full implementation of this scale in Testable.

► View detailed implementation guide in Testable – Step by step instructions for building and customising scales, questionnaires, and forms

► Browse other tests and scales in Testable Library – The largest collection of ready-made psychological tests and scales.

Copyright and Usage Responsibility: Check that you have the proper rights and permissions to use this assessment tool in your research. This may include purchasing appropriate licenses, obtaining permissions from authors/copyright holders, or ensuring your usage falls within fair use guidelines.

Proper Attribution: When using or referencing this scale, cite the original development:

  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156.

The Flourishing Scale is freely available for research and educational use. For more information, visit: http://labs.psychology.illinois.edu/~ediener/

References

Primary Development:

  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156.

Complete Mental Health Model:

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207-222.
  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 539-548.

Validation Research:

  • Silva, A. J., & Caetano, A. (2013). Validation of the Flourishing Scale and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in Portugal. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 469-478.
  • Hone, L. C., et al. (2014). Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 4(1), 62-90.

Intervention Research:

  • Seligman, M. E. P., et al. (2005). Positive psychology progress. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421.
  • Seligman, M. E. P., et al. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61(8), 774-788.

Wellbeing Therapy:

Fava, G. A., & Tomba, E. (2009). Increasing psychological well-being and resilience by psychotherapeutic methods. Journal of Personality, 77(6), 1903-1934.

Illustration of a vibrant kingfisher with brilliant turquoise and orange plumage perched on a rock in clear water, with its reflection visible below, surrounded by aquatic plants and sparkles, with the Testable logo and text "FS Flourishing Scale"
A radiant kingfisher thriving in its natural habitat — a symbol of psychological flourishing, well-being, and human potential measured by the FS (Flourishing Scale)

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the FS measure?

The Flourishing Scale (FS) measures psychological flourishing and eudaimonic wellbeing across eight core domains: purpose and meaning, supportive relationships, engagement, contributing to others, competence, self-respect, optimism, and being respected. It assesses self-perceived success in areas of optimal human functioning beyond just happiness or life satisfaction.

How long does the FS take to complete?

The Flourishing Scale takes approximately 2-3 minutes to complete. It consists of only 8 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale, making it an ultra-brief yet comprehensive assessment of psychological prosperity suitable for research, clinical practice, and population surveillance.

Is the FS free to use?

Yes, the Flourishing Scale is freely available for research and educational use. Researchers can access the scale and related materials at no cost from Ed Diener's laboratory website at the University of Illinois. Proper citation of the original 2010 development article is required when using the scale.

How is the FS scored?

The FS is scored by summing all 8 items (no reverse scoring needed), producing a total score ranging from 8 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater flourishing. Scores of 48-56 indicate high flourishing, 40-47 moderate flourishing, 32-39 average, 24-31 languishing, and 8-23 low flourishing.

What's the difference between FS and SWLS?

The FS measures eudaimonic wellbeing (meaning, purpose, engagement, optimal functioning) while the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) measures hedonic wellbeing (life satisfaction and happiness). The FS was designed to complement the SWLS, and together they provide comprehensive assessment of both dimensions of wellbeing in just 13 total items.

How reliable is the FS?

The FS demonstrates strong reliability with internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.87 in U.S. samples and 0.78-0.89 across international cultures. Test-retest reliability is 0.71 over one month. The scale shows good temporal stability while remaining sensitive to meaningful life changes and intervention effects.
Last Updated: